Agreement, keyword purchase, and you will conjunction in some types of Arabic
- ^ The five sandwich-type of fillers were: crossbreed contract nouns which have good possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s next-door neighbor,” in which komsija can produce Yards or F agreement), as in (15b); hybrid agreement nouns which have an effective possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my personal laugher,” where cerekalo is also bring about Yards otherwise N agreement), like in (15c); NSg animate nouns having an enthusiastic ordinal count [prvo prase “(the) first pig,” where prase keeps a crossbreed plural mode, causing FSg or NPl contract], as with (15d); regular agreement nouns with good MSg moderate complement [uspeh dekana “(the) victory (of) dean,” where in actuality the genitive complement is actually homonymous towards the paucal, plus the paucal allows paucal and MPl agreement], such as (15e); regular agreement MSg nouns which have a great PP complement (prijatelj iz skole “the new friend of school,” in which attraction outcomes would be expected), like in (15f).
- ^ The fresh new salience of the examples is actually controlled about after the method. Basic, you to copywriter designed the newest examples centered on the girl intuition, while the other evaluated him or her; in which dispute emerged, advice was replaced additionally the process is frequent into newly introduced instances.
- ^ The necessity of the essential difference between arrangement models for the updates single parent match Review is orthogonal towards hypotheses on the attract of one’s papers, as they just create forecasts about the cousin quantity within conditions, or between your requirements and also the legs-range rates. We report these assessment in the interests of completeness of your own report, just like the informed by the publishers of your own volume.
- ^ You will find tailored and applied a different sort of check out in this way, and we are presently looking at the data.
Records
Arsenijevic, B., and you will Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effect of animacy and you can agentivity on the running off arrangement during the Serbo-Croatian,” into the Education for the Dialects and Notice, Picked paperwork off 3rd Novi Sad Workshop to the Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and Clinical Linguistic Look, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you may S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Unfortunate: Faculty out-of Opinions), 41–77.
Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, We. (2016b). Towards the into the dependency from gender regarding count into the arrangement which have paired victims: a fresh investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 41–69.
Ba). Morphology, arrangement and working thoughts recovery inside the sentence manufacturing: facts away from gender and situation in Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.
Hairdresser, H., and you may Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical intercourse and count arrangement into the Language: A keen ERP assessment. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.
Bhatt, Roentgen., and you will Walkow, M. (2013). Locating contract for the sentence structure: a disagreement from arrangement within the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Idea 29, 951–1013.
Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom you srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.
Lme4: Linear Combined-Consequences Patterns Playing with S4 Classes
Carminati, Yards. (2005). Operating reactions of your ability ladder (people > number > gender) and you may effects to possess linguistic theory. Lingua 115, 259–285.
Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation by the Phase,” into the Ken Hale. A lifestyle in the Words, ed. Yards. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Drive), 1–52.
Citko, B. (2004). “Agreement asymmetries during the enhance structures,” into the Official Approaches to Slavic linguistics: The fresh Ottawa Conference 2003, eds A. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you may D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications), 91–108.
De Vincenzi, Yards. (1999). Differences when considering the morphology away from intercourse and amount: proof regarding establishing coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. twenty-eight, 537–553.
De Vincenzi, Yards., and you will Di Domenico, Age. (1999). A big change one of ?-features: the new character from intercourse and you will matter from the recovery from pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 41–74.
Doron, E. (2000). “VSO and leftover-conjunct agreement : biblical Hebrew against. modern Hebrew,” from the Sentence structure of one’s Verb Initially Languages, eds A good. Carnie and E. Guilfoyle (Ny, NY: Oxford College or university Drive), 75–96.