El mobbing

Fb Comments Talk

Every single day Sun’s Twitter page shall be know because a public discussion board in which website subscribers share opinions with the tales throughout the day. They goes with the fresh new paper’s every single day letters webpage by means of hence customers participate in building the newest moral and you may personal size of this new envisioned people off “SunLand,” including the sex purchase (Smith and you can Adendorff 2014; Boshoff, 2021b). “Who’s Ben 10 between the 2 while they the search such as pensioners 2 myself,” captures the belief of these listings. But not, brand new joking has its limits, alua as a whole viewer irritably claims, “which ain no laughing matter their an excellent seious matr (severe matter) so stop laughn mxm (phrase away from disapproval).” Woven amongst the dismissive laughter is actually a significant thread of interest on sex relationships-“Discover need certainly to reconsider the dwelling regarding matchmaking”-and this acknowledges a main topic one needs notice. There are two main strands compared to that thread: you’re concerned about what happens whenever contemporary patriarchal gender connections, hence recommend multiple couples for males, are overturned of the female claiming the legal right to try to be males do; the second is selecting intercourse as a key part within compliment dating.

Of numerous comments released in response toward story mockingly deride new look of this new characters involved, especially the supposed age of little partner

In the first strand, commentators contrast Puseletso’s latest plan towards the regional practice of polygamy, which is lined up that have “customized.” Specific condemn, while some explain exactly what be seemingly the positive aspects off Puseletso’s action to take. Those who applaud the woman decision when deciding to take good Ben ten spouse comment gleefully for the societal norm that reasons numerous sexual lovers for men, and you can assert that it’s high time females performed a similar: “Yes mom, this is your date today. Guys have been this forever of your energy,” states that. “Good for the lady!” exclaims another, “This type of men need certainly to become just how a number of the lady feel about polygamy.” Angrily, anyone calls aside patriarchal double criteria, observing you to men “bring 2 if you don’t 4 wives and more however, as soon due to the fact a lady will it she’s titled an excellent hoe (whore) Mxm,” and you may concluding you to guys are a “lot of hypocrites.”

So it disagreement turns on the idea of “democracy” and its implicit rights, which are not always viewed favorably: overall commentator sarcastically feedback, “yah neh their Democracy.” Particular quip caustically into the highly noticeable analogy set by after that Southern area African Chairman, Jacob Zuma, a beneficial polygamous husband: “i’m able to find tha you’re contending having Zuma!” and you may, “A great polygammy Zuma performed t earliest today we’re together with undertaking t he is top from the analogy.” The latter commentator and additionally rey “is actually court into the SA,” a spot taken up to because of the another which exclaims that every unions have to be addressed just as: “Polygamy was favoured by the our parliament; hence polyandry must be preferred!” That it commentator also offers to assist Puseletso: “I will be their Endorse Puseletso when you look at the joining each other marriage ceremonies legitimately,” claiming one “here is the 21st millennium. Equality need prevail. ”

Yet not, it confident reception is countered because of the a very pessimistic reading. The very thought of such “equality” try staggering to many, visible for the comments one feedback in it in the shape of the idiomatic term “50 fifty.” So it words looks into the Hunter’s (2010: 132) ethnography, where the guy notices exactly how girls believe “when you look at the a scene, they currently have the right to has actually several people, just like guys.” Thus, you to definitely commentator exclaims in amazement, “Yhoooo nahh (phrase from disbelief) We have never seen which in my lifestyle, yhooo ke 50 fifty str8 (it is fifty fifty upright)”; if you find yourself other feedback that “becoz their 50 50 thus y her be able to rating one or two males lyk (exactly as) males simply take a couple of wifes huh.” “That is forbidden within our culture” goes on the initial. Men members specifically think that it’s impossible for a couple of people to live on under one roof: “yoh how do i sleep knowing my wife is having gender that have several other kid?” asks you to, when you are some other responses “Poo pedi sakeng tlhe banna (a couple bulls in one single sack; i.elizabeth., one or two males in one place), that is extreme.” The employment of the vernacular idiom, hence constructs guys due to the fact competitors which never show a gap (rather than women who are expected to achieve this within the polygamous unions) pushes household that it reader’s part on individualized – to have your, Puseletso’s plan is simply immoral: “We are surely dropping our very own morals and thinking.” Other likewise condemns new arrangement, sternly adhorting the fresh partner to finish the relationship: lomama isifebe (the woman is promiscuous), lobaba wokuqala akayeke lomama (new spouse should get-off the girl).