El mobbing

When it comes to aspect off intimate jealousy, throughout the forty notice-report products have been claimed because the production of brand new Care about-Report and you may Projective Jealousy Balances (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of numerous tools were used only once. , 1992) created to assess sex variations; new Multidimensional Envy Level (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) built to gauge the three size of envy (cognitive, mental and you can behavioral dimensions); new Fb Jealousy Level (Muise, Christofides, & Des) geared towards researching Eharmony vs Christian mingle the possibilities of an event which causes attitude away from envy participants pertaining to the hobby into Twitter; the brand new Envy Scale (Buunk, 1997), familiar with evaluate about three sort of jealousy (reactive, stressed and you can precautionary) and the Social Jealousy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and this assesses the new bad feelings because of genuine or endangered losses away from a loved person to a competitor.

Into the Brazil, new Personal Envy Inventory are revised (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) As for Colombia, there are not any psychometric studies off a specific measure on intimate envy

On Latin-american perspective, there is a version in Chile of your Index from Behavior of your own Couples That can cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). From inside the Mexico, a great Multidimensional Measure of Envy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) might have been elaborated and a preliminary studies try through with the newest Multidimensional Directory from Close Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). At the same time, earlier in the day education did not manage Factorial Confirmatory Analysis (CFA) in order to corroborate the new basis design located, and you may lower reliability profile was basically used in the factors (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise brief trials were utilized (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).

The fresh IJS set up for Mathes and you may Severa (1981) the most utilized scales for evaluating personal envy, they discover half a dozen items that assess the susceptibility so you’re able to dangers relevant to: (a) Lover’s unfaithfulness and matchmaking someone else (points step 1, step 3, a dozen, fourteen, 15, 16, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you can 25); (b) Partner’s prominence (items 2, 3, 4, seven, 10, thirteen, 17, 20, and you may 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy lover (affairs step one, 4, 6, 19, and you can 21); (d) Partner’s old times (products eleven, twenty-four, twenty six, twenty-seven, and you will twenty eight); (e) Partner’s indifference (affairs 8, nine and twenty-four); and you may (f) Lover’s remaining family unit members that have old dates and you will intercourse distinctions (issues 5 and you will 18).

The devices in the above list have demostrated enough levels of legitimacy and precision

There are four knowledge that have checked-out when it comes to their accuracy and you may legitimacy. Mathes and you can Severa (1981) establish a couple education, together with basic data performed the development of one’s scale with 39 situations, that has been less to help you twenty-eight affairs once analytical studies. After that, when you look at the an additional analysis, IJS was applied next to other balances one to evaluated intimate love-backlinks, low self-esteem, self-value and you will an ad hoc survey off independent identities, confirming, centered on concept, the expert out of envy, the better the amount of Close like therefore the cheaper the fresh separate identity of your own few. Contained in this studies, i report a beneficial coefficient of reliability away from .ninety five into overall measure. In a third studies, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you may Manhood (1982), so you’re able to stretch brand new symptoms out-of authenticity, made use of the IJS as well as 2 behavioral procedures: (a) chances whenever confronted by a rival and you can (b) terms regarding possessiveness with the lover, due to a telephone call that they designed to the person who participated in the study. The brand new expected correlations had been acquired, which once more served this new validity of your size. Eventually, when you look at the a 4th analysis, Mathes, Roter and you can Joerger (1982) corroborated the brand new convergent authenticity regarding IJS together with other balances you to evaluated romantic envy.